EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021TN0722

Case T-722/21: Action brought on 11 November 2021 — D’Amato and Others v Parliament

OJ C 11, 10.1.2022, p. 36–36 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)



Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/36

Action brought on 11 November 2021 — D’Amato and Others v Parliament

(Case T-722/21)

(2022/C 11/49)

Language of the case: French


Applicants: Rosa D’Amato (Taranto, Italy), Claude Gruffat (Mulsans, France), Damien Carême (Argenteuil, France) and Benoît Biteau (Sablonceaux, France) (represented by: P. de Bandt, M. Gherghinaru and L. Panepinto, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

order the annulment of the decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 27 October 2021 on exceptional health and safety rules governing access to the European Parliament buildings at its three places of work;

order the defendant to pay all the costs, including those relating to the application for suspension of operation of the contested decision.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law that are identical or similar to those relied upon in Case T-710/21, Roos and Others v Parliament.