Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 February 2023.#UniSkin ApS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild – Earlier national figurative mark UNICSKIN YOUR EFFECTIVE SOLUTION – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods and services – Distinctive character of the earlier mark – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-787/21.

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 February 2023.
UniSkin ApS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild – Earlier national figurative mark UNICSKIN YOUR EFFECTIVE SOLUTION – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods and services – Distinctive character of the earlier mark – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-787/21.

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 February 2023.
UniSkin ApS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild – Earlier national figurative mark UNICSKIN YOUR EFFECTIVE SOLUTION – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods and services – Distinctive character of the earlier mark – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-787/21.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:56