This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TA0400
Case T-400/21: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — ZR v EUIPO (Civil service — Officials — Vacancy notice — Application for interinstitutional transfer — First paragraph of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations — Transfer refusal — Priority order — Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Duty of care — Corrigendum)
Case T-400/21: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — ZR v EUIPO (Civil service — Officials — Vacancy notice — Application for interinstitutional transfer — First paragraph of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations — Transfer refusal — Priority order — Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Duty of care — Corrigendum)
Case T-400/21: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — ZR v EUIPO (Civil service — Officials — Vacancy notice — Application for interinstitutional transfer — First paragraph of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations — Transfer refusal — Priority order — Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Duty of care — Corrigendum)
OJ C 179, 22.5.2023, p. 29–30
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
22.5.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 179/29 |
Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — ZR v EUIPO
(Case T-400/21) (1)
(Civil service - Officials - Vacancy notice - Application for interinstitutional transfer - First paragraph of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations - Transfer refusal - Priority order - Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations - Equal treatment - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Duty of care - Corrigendum)
(2023/C 179/41)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: ZR (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: G. Predonzani and K. Tóth, acting as Agents)
Re:
By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 September 2020 rejecting her application for a transfer to EUIPO.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders ZR to pay the costs. |