This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TA0029
Case T-29/21: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Beveland v EUIPO — Super B (BUCANERO) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark BUCANERO — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 58(1) point (a) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark — Proof of genuine use)
Case T-29/21: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Beveland v EUIPO — Super B (BUCANERO) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark BUCANERO — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 58(1) point (a) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark — Proof of genuine use)
Case T-29/21: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Beveland v EUIPO — Super B (BUCANERO) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark BUCANERO — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 58(1) point (a) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark — Proof of genuine use)
OJ C 303, 8.8.2022, p. 40–40
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
8.8.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 303/40 |
Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Beveland v EUIPO — Super B (BUCANERO)
(Case T-29/21) (1)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark BUCANERO - Genuine use of the trade mark - Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 58(1) point (a) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark - Proof of genuine use)
(2022/C 303/49)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Beveland, SA (Sant Joan les Fonts, Spain) (represented by: J. Carbonell Callicó, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Super B, SL (Talavera de la Reina, Spain) (represented by: K. Guridi Sedlak, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 November 2020 (Case R 1046/2020-5), relating to revocation proceedings between Beveland and Super B.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Beveland, SA to pay the costs. |