EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021CN0640

Case C-640/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Cluj (Romania) lodged on 19 October 2021 — SC Zes Zollner Electronic SRL v Direcția Regională Vamală Cluj — Biroul Vamal de Frontieră Aeroport Cluj Napoca

OJ C 64, 7.2.2022, p. 13–13 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

7.2.2022   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/13


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Cluj (Romania) lodged on 19 October 2021 — SC Zes Zollner Electronic SRL v Direcția Regională Vamală Cluj — Biroul Vamal de Frontieră Aeroport Cluj Napoca

(Case C-640/21)

(2022/C 64/21)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Cluj

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: SC Zes Zollner Electronic SRL

Respondent: Direcția Regională Vamală Cluj — Biroul Vamal de Frontieră Aeroport Cluj Napoca

Questions referred

1.

Does Article 173 or Article 174 of Regulation No 952/2013 (1) apply where the consignee of the goods reports a quantity in excess of that stated in the original customs declaration?

2.

Does the expression ‘goods other than those which [the customs declaration] originally covered’ within the meaning of Article 173 of the regulation refer to goods that differ quantitatively or qualitatively, or both?

3.

In the case of a quantitative difference that exceeds the quantity of goods stated in the customs declaration, does the consignee of the goods have any procedural remedy under the [abovementioned] regulation enabling the consignee to correct the errors without incurring administrative or criminal penalties?


(1)  Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ 2013 L 269, p. 1).


Top