Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62021CN0630

    Case C-630/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 13 October 2021 — O.K. v Mercedes-Benz Bank AG

    OJ C 73, 14.2.2022, p. 6–6 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
    OJ C 73, 14.2.2022, p. 3–3 (GA)

    14.2.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 73/6

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 13 October 2021 — O.K. v Mercedes-Benz Bank AG

    (Case C-630/21)

    (2022/C 73/08)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant and appellant: O.K.

    Defendant and respondent: Mercedes-Benz Bank AG

    Questions referred

    1.

    Is Article 14 of Directive 2008/48 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the consumer’s right of withdrawal no longer exists if the credit agreement has been fully performed by both parties?

    2.

    If Question 1. is answered in the negative:

    Does Article 14 of Directive 2008/48 preclude a rule in the national law of a Member State which has the effect that the consumer’s right of withdrawal can no longer be exercised if the credit agreement has been fully performed by both parties?

    3.

    If Question 1. is answered in the negative and Question 2. in the affirmative:

    Does Article 14(3) of Directive 2008/48 preclude a rule in the national law of a Member State under which a consumer who has effectively exercised his or her right of withdrawal based on Article 14(1) of Directive 2008/48 has a right to have the creditor surrender the benefits that it has derived from the payments that the consumer has made to it up to the time of withdrawal?

    (1)  Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC (OJ 2008 L 133, p. 66).

    Top