This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021CN0462
Case C-462/21 P: Appeal brought on 28 July 2021 by Puma SE against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 19 May 2021 in Case T-510/19, Puma v EUIPO — Gemma Group (Representation of a bounding feline)
Case C-462/21 P: Appeal brought on 28 July 2021 by Puma SE against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 19 May 2021 in Case T-510/19, Puma v EUIPO — Gemma Group (Representation of a bounding feline)
Case C-462/21 P: Appeal brought on 28 July 2021 by Puma SE against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 19 May 2021 in Case T-510/19, Puma v EUIPO — Gemma Group (Representation of a bounding feline)
OJ C 51, 31.1.2022, p. 16–16
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
31.1.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 51/16 |
Appeal brought on 28 July 2021 by Puma SE against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 19 May 2021 in Case T-510/19, Puma v EUIPO — Gemma Group (Representation of a bounding feline)
(Case C-462/21 P)
(2022/C 51/20)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Puma SE (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, abogado)
Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
By order of 1 December 2021, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Puma SE should bear its own costs.