This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TN0586
Case T-586/20: Action brought on 24 September 2020 — MN v Europol
Case T-586/20: Action brought on 24 September 2020 — MN v Europol
Case T-586/20: Action brought on 24 September 2020 — MN v Europol
OJ C 433, 14.12.2020, p. 55–55
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
14.12.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 433/55 |
Action brought on 24 September 2020 — MN v Europol
(Case T-586/20)
(2020/C 433/69)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: MN (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
Defendant: The European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the decision of 6 March 2020 not to renew the applicant’s contract for an indefinite period; |
|
— |
order Europol to pay the applicant the sum of EUR 25 000 for the non-material harm suffered by the applicant as a result of the contested decision; |
|
— |
order Europol to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
|
1. |
First plea in law, alleging illegality of the criterion used to justify the non-renewal of the applicant’s contract for an indefinite period, in that it does not allow the interests of the service to be identified. |
|
2. |
Second plea in law, in the alternative, alleging multiple manifest errors of assessment vitiating the contested decision. |