This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TJ0429
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#Sedus Stoll AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Sedus ergo+ – Earlier national word mark ERGOPLUS – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-429/20.
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 October 2021.
Sedus Stoll AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Sedus ergo+ – Earlier national word mark ERGOPLUS – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-429/20.
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 October 2021.
Sedus Stoll AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Sedus ergo+ – Earlier national word mark ERGOPLUS – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-429/20.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2021:698