This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Case T-38/20: Order of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Lotto24 v EUIPO (LOTTO24) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark LOTTO24 — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-38/20: Order of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Lotto24 v EUIPO (LOTTO24) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark LOTTO24 — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-38/20: Order of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Lotto24 v EUIPO (LOTTO24) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark LOTTO24 — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
OJ C 9, 11.1.2021, p. 22–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
11.1.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 9/22 |
Order of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Lotto24 v EUIPO (LOTTO24)
(Case T-38/20) (1)
(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark LOTTO24 - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2021/C 9/32)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Lotto24 AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: O. Brexl, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Manea and A. Söder, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 November 2019 (Case R 1216/2019-2), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign LOTTO24 as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the order
1. |
The action is dismissed. |
2. |
Lotto24 AG shall pay the costs. |