EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TA0732
Case T-732/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Freundlieb v EUIPO (CRYSTAL) (EU trade mark — EU word mark CRYSTAL — Failure to apply for renewal of the trade mark registration — Revocation of the trade mark on expiry of the registration — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 104 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Duty of care — No review — Failure to comply with time limits)
Case T-732/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Freundlieb v EUIPO (CRYSTAL) (EU trade mark — EU word mark CRYSTAL — Failure to apply for renewal of the trade mark registration — Revocation of the trade mark on expiry of the registration — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 104 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Duty of care — No review — Failure to comply with time limits)
Case T-732/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Freundlieb v EUIPO (CRYSTAL) (EU trade mark — EU word mark CRYSTAL — Failure to apply for renewal of the trade mark registration — Revocation of the trade mark on expiry of the registration — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 104 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Duty of care — No review — Failure to comply with time limits)
OJ C 490, 6.12.2021, p. 41–41 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
6.12.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 490/41 |
Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Freundlieb v EUIPO (CRYSTAL)
(Case T-732/20) (1)
(EU trade mark - EU word mark CRYSTAL - Failure to apply for renewal of the trade mark registration - Revocation of the trade mark on expiry of the registration - Application for restitutio in integrum - Article 104 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Duty of care - No review - Failure to comply with time limits)
(2021/C 490/48)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Andreas Freundlieb (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: J. Vogtmeier, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 October 2020 (Case R 1056/2020-5), relating to an application for restitutio in integrum in relation to the right to apply for renewal of the EU word mark CRYSTAL.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Andreas Freundlieb to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |