This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TA0681
Case T-681/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — OC v EEAS (Liability — Civil service — EEAS staff posted to a third country — Reporting of irregularities — Inspection report — Transfer — Acts adversely affecting an official — Conduct not entailing a decision — Compliance with the requirements of the pre-litigation procedure — Protection of whistleblowers — Article 22a of the Staff Regulations — Duty of care — Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Right to privacy — Protection of personal data)
Case T-681/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — OC v EEAS (Liability — Civil service — EEAS staff posted to a third country — Reporting of irregularities — Inspection report — Transfer — Acts adversely affecting an official — Conduct not entailing a decision — Compliance with the requirements of the pre-litigation procedure — Protection of whistleblowers — Article 22a of the Staff Regulations — Duty of care — Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Right to privacy — Protection of personal data)
Case T-681/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — OC v EEAS (Liability — Civil service — EEAS staff posted to a third country — Reporting of irregularities — Inspection report — Transfer — Acts adversely affecting an official — Conduct not entailing a decision — Compliance with the requirements of the pre-litigation procedure — Protection of whistleblowers — Article 22a of the Staff Regulations — Duty of care — Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Right to privacy — Protection of personal data)
OJ C 340, 5.9.2022, p. 32–32
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
5.9.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 340/32 |
Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — OC v EEAS
(Case T-681/20) (1)
(Liability - Civil service - EEAS staff posted to a third country - Reporting of irregularities - Inspection report - Transfer - Acts adversely affecting an official - Conduct not entailing a decision - Compliance with the requirements of the pre-litigation procedure - Protection of whistleblowers - Article 22a of the Staff Regulations - Duty of care - Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Right to privacy - Protection of personal data)
(2022/C 340/42)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: OC (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spáč, acting as Agents)
Re:
By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks compensation for the damage that she allegedly suffered as a result of acts or conduct of the European External Action Service (EEAS).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Orders the European External Action Service (EEAS) to pay the sum of EUR 10 000 to OC for the non-material damage suffered; |
|
2. |
Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
|
3. |
Orders the EEAS to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by OC. |