Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62020TA0159

Case T-159/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Hamers v Cedefop (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Investigation conducted by OLAF — Transmission to national judicial authorities of information relating to facts liable to lead to criminal proceedings — National criminal proceedings — Acquittal — Cedefop’s conduct in relation to the national criminal proceedings — Rejection of the claim for compensation — Action for annulment and damages — Conflict of interests — Presumption of innocence — Powers of Cedefop’s Board of Appeal)

OJ C 84, 21.2.2022, pp. 35–36 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 84, 21.2.2022, p. 13–13 (GA)

21.2.2022   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/35


Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Hamers v Cedefop

(Case T-159/20) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Investigation conducted by OLAF - Transmission to national judicial authorities of information relating to facts liable to lead to criminal proceedings - National criminal proceedings - Acquittal - Cedefop’s conduct in relation to the national criminal proceedings - Rejection of the claim for compensation - Action for annulment and damages - Conflict of interests - Presumption of innocence - Powers of Cedefop’s Board of Appeal)

(2022/C 84/49)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Helene Hamers (Angelochori, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, A. Politis, M. Rodopoulos and A. Skoulikis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (represented by: J. Siebel and L. Zacheilas, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur and C. Meidanis, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of Cedefop’s implied decision of 19 January 2020 rejecting the complaint concerning a claim for compensation for damage allegedly suffered by the applicant and, second, compensation for that damage.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Ms Helene Hamers to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.


Top