Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62020CN0326

    Case C-326/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa (Latvia) lodged on 22 July 2020 — SIA MONO v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

    OJ C 329, 5.10.2020, p. 5–6 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    5.10.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 329/5

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa (Latvia) lodged on 22 July 2020 — SIA MONO v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

    (Case C-326/20)

    (2020/C 329/07)

    Language of the case: Latvian

    Referring court

    Administratīvā apgabaltiesa

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant at first instance and appellant on appeal: SIA MONO

    Defendant and appellant on appeal: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

    Questions referred

    1.

    Must Article 12(1) of Council Directive 2008/118/EC of 16 December 2008 concerning the general arrangements for excise duty and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC (1) be interpreted as meaning that excise goods intended to be used in the context of diplomatic or consular relations are to be exempted from excise duty on the condition that payment for the goods in question is to be made by non-cash means, that payment has actually been made, and that the payment to the supplier was made by the actual recipients of the goods?

    2.

    Must Article 12(2) of Council Directive 2008/118/EC of 16 December 2008 concerning the general arrangements for excise duty and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC be interpreted as meaning that Member States may lay down conditions and limitations which, in the context of diplomatic and consular relations, make the exemption from duty for excise goods subject to the requirement that the purchaser of the goods has actually paid for the goods by non-cash means?

    (1)  OJ 2009 L 9, p. 12.

    Top