This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TN0607
Case T-607/19: Action brought on 5 September 2019 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO (FAKE DUCK)
Case T-607/19: Action brought on 5 September 2019 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO (FAKE DUCK)
Case T-607/19: Action brought on 5 September 2019 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO (FAKE DUCK)
OJ C 372, 4.11.2019, p. 34–34
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
4.11.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 372/34 |
Action brought on 5 September 2019 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO (FAKE DUCK)
(Case T-607/19)
(2019/C 372/35)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Itinerant Show Room Srl (San Giorgio in Bosco, Italy) (represented by: E. Montelione, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark FAKE DUCK — Application for registration No. 17 946 879
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 July 2019 in Case R 830/2019-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Failure to take into account the inherent distinctive character of the mark FAKE DUCK; |
|
— |
Failure to take into account the complexity of the mark FAKE DUCK and the picture of an egg; |
|
— |
Misapplication of the principle of equal treatment; |
|
— |
Misapplication of the principle of legality. |