Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019TN0366

    Case T-366/19: Action brought on 18 June 2019 — Sboarina v Parliament

    OJ C 263, 5.8.2019, p. 66–66 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    5.8.2019   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 263/66


    Action brought on 18 June 2019 — Sboarina v Parliament

    (Case T-366/19)

    (2019/C 263/71)

    Language of the case: Italian

    Parties

    Applicant: Gabriele Sboarina (Verona, Italy) (represented by: M. Paniz, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Parliament

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul the communiqué of the European Parliament Directorate-General for Finance implementing Resolution No 14/2018 of 12 July 2018 of the Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies and/or Resolution No 6/2018 of the Presidential Council of the Senate of the Italian Republic, and, in any event,

    annul the redetermination and recalculation of the life annuity disbursed by the European Parliament;

    accordingly, declare that the applicant is entitled to the maintenance of the life annuity in question in so far as it was accrued and is being accrued on the basis of the legislation in force prior to Resolution No 14/2018 of the Office of the President of the Italian Chamber [of Deputies] and/or Resolution No 6/2018 of the Presidential Council of the Senate of the Italian Republic, and order the European Parliament to pay him all the sums unduly withheld, adjusted for inflation, together with statutory interest from the date of withholding until the date of payment;

    order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and immediately to restore in full the original amount of the life annuity, and to pay compensation for all damages if and to the extent that damages are payable to the applicant; and

    in any event, order the Parliament to pay all costs, lawyers’ fees, plus VAT, taxes, duties and flat-rate charges.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-345/19, Santini v Parliament.


    Top