EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TB0171
Case T-171/19: Order of the General Court of 7 June 2019 — Hebberecht v EEAS (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Suspension — Amounts withheld from remuneration — Failure to comply with the procedural requirements — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-171/19: Order of the General Court of 7 June 2019 — Hebberecht v EEAS (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Suspension — Amounts withheld from remuneration — Failure to comply with the procedural requirements — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-171/19: Order of the General Court of 7 June 2019 — Hebberecht v EEAS (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Suspension — Amounts withheld from remuneration — Failure to comply with the procedural requirements — Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C 255, 29.7.2019, p. 44–44
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
29.7.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 255/44 |
Order of the General Court of 7 June 2019 — Hebberecht v EEAS
(Case T-171/19) (1)
(Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary proceedings - Suspension - Amounts withheld from remuneration - Failure to comply with the procedural requirements - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2019/C 255/57)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Chantal Hebberecht (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: K. Bicard, lawyer)
Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spac, Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking, first, annulment of the EEAS’s decision communicated to the applicant on 20 September 2018 rejecting the applicant’s complaint directed against the EEAS’s decision to suspend her from her duties and to withhold amounts from her monthly salary and, secondly, payment of compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Ms Chantal Hebberecht shall pay her own costs. |