Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019TA0495

    Case T-495/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2021 — Romania v Commission (Law governing the institutions — European citizen’s initiative — Cohesion policy — National minority regions — Registration decision — Action for annulment — Actionable measure — Admissibility — Article 4(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 — Obligation to state reasons)

    OJ C 11, 10.1.2022, p. 22–23 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    10.1.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 11/22


    Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2021 — Romania v Commission

    (Case T-495/19) (1)

    (Law governing the institutions - European citizen’s initiative - Cohesion policy - National minority regions - Registration decision - Action for annulment - Actionable measure - Admissibility - Article 4(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 - Obligation to state reasons)

    (2022/C 11/29)

    Language of the case: Romanian

    Parties

    Applicant: Romania (represented by: E. Gane, R. Haţieganu, L. Liţu and L.-E. Baţagoi, acting as Agents)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Stancu, I. Martínez del Peral and H. Krämer, acting as Agents)

    Intervener in support of the defendant: Hungary (represented by: M. Fehér, M. Tátrai and K. Szíjjártó, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/721 of 30 April 2019 on the proposed citizens’ initiative entitled ‘Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures’ (OJ 2019 L 122, p. 55).

    Operative part of the judgment

    The General Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Romania to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

    3.

    Orders Hungary to bear its own costs.


    (1)  OJ C 288, 26.8.2019.


    Top