Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019TA0127

    Case T-127/19: Judgment of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — Dyson and Others v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Energy — Directive 2010/30/EU — Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy — Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 — Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners — Energy efficiency — Measurement method — Annulment by the General Court — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals)

    OJ C 73, 14.2.2022, p. 33–34 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
    OJ C 73, 14.2.2022, p. 10–10 (GA)

    14.2.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 73/33


    Judgment of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — Dyson and Others v Commission

    (Case T-127/19) (1)

    (Non-contractual liability - Energy - Directive 2010/30/EU - Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy - Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 - Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners - Energy efficiency - Measurement method - Annulment by the General Court - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals)

    (2022/C 73/38)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicants: Dyson Ltd (Malmesbury, United Kingdom) and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex (represented by: E. Batchelor, T. Selwyn Sharpe and M. Healy, Solicitors)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, Y. Marinova and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Application based on Article 268 TFEU for compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the unlawfulness of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 of 3 May 2013 supplementing Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to energy labelling of vacuum cleaners (OJ 2013 L 192, p. 1).

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Dyson Ltd and the other applicants whose names appear in the annex shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.


    (1)  OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.


    Top