Retour vers la page d'accueil d'EUR-Lex

EUR-Lex L'accès au droit de l'Union européenne

Retour vers la page d'accueil d'EUR-Lex

Ce document est extrait du site web EUR-Lex

Utilisez des guillemets («" "») pour effectuer une recherche sur une expression exacte. Ajoutez un astérisque («*») à un terme de recherche pour en trouver des variantes («transp*» ou «32019R*»). Utilisez un point d’interrogation («?») pour remplacer un caractère dans votre terme de recherche afin d’en trouver des variantes (exemple: «ca?e» fournira les résultats correspondant à «case», «cape», etc.).
Conseils pour la recherche
Besoin de plus d’options de recherche? Utilisez Recherche avancée
Vous êtes ici

Document 62019CN0637

Case C-637/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea Hovrätt — Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 27 August 2019 — BY v CX

OJ C 372, 4.11.2019, p. 19–20 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

4.11.2019   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 372/19

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea Hovrätt — Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 27 August 2019 — BY v CX

(Case C-637/19)

(2019/C 372/21)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Svea Hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: BY

Defendant: CX

Questions referred

1.

Does the term ‘public’ in Articles 3(1) and 4(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society have a uniform meaning?

2.

If question 1 is answered in the affirmative, is a court to be regarded as falling within the scope of the term ‘public’ within the meaning of those provisions?

3.

If question 1 is answered in the negative:

(a)

in the event of communication of a protected work to a court, can that court fall within the scope of the term ‘public’?

(b)

in the event of distribution of a protected work to a court, can that court fall within the scope of the term ‘public’?

4.

Does the fact that national legislation lays down a general principle of access to public documents in accordance with which any person who makes a request can access procedural documents submitted to a court, except where they contain confidential information, affect the assessment of whether submission to a court of a protected work amounts to a ‘communication to the public’ or a ‘distribution to the public’?

(1)  OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10.

Haut