EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019CB0553

Case C-553/19 P: Order of the Court of (Ninth Chamber) 2 April 2020 — International Tax Stamp Association Ltd (ITSA) v European Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Approximation of laws — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products and related products — Establishment and operation of a traceability system for tobacco products — Delegated Regulation and implementing acts — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU — Lack of direct concern — Article 256(1), second subparagraph, TFEU — Article 58, first paragraph, of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Article 168(1)(d) and Article 169(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — No precise identification of the contested points in the grounds of the judgment under appeal or specific legal arguments in support of the appeal — Arguments seeking to obtain from the Court a mere re-examination of the arguments presented at first instance — Appeal manifestly inadmissible)

OJ C 287, 31.8.2020, p. 19–20 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

31.8.2020   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/19


Order of the Court of (Ninth Chamber) 2 April 2020 — International Tax Stamp Association Ltd (ITSA) v European Commission

(Case C-553/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Approximation of laws - Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products and related products - Establishment and operation of a traceability system for tobacco products - Delegated Regulation and implementing acts - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU - Lack of direct concern - Article 256(1), second subparagraph, TFEU - Article 58, first paragraph, of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union - Article 168(1)(d) and Article 169(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - No precise identification of the contested points in the grounds of the judgment under appeal or specific legal arguments in support of the appeal - Arguments seeking to obtain from the Court a mere re-examination of the arguments presented at first instance - Appeal manifestly inadmissible)

(2020/C 287/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: International Tax Stamp Association Ltd (ITSA) (represented by: F. Scanvic, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: I. Rubene and C. Valero, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1.

The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

2.

International Tax Stamp Association Ltd (ITSA) is ordered to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 357, 21.10.2019.


Top