This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TN0136
Case T-136/18: Action brought on 1 March 2018 — Kuota International v EUIPO — Sintema Sport (K)
Case T-136/18: Action brought on 1 March 2018 — Kuota International v EUIPO — Sintema Sport (K)
Case T-136/18: Action brought on 1 March 2018 — Kuota International v EUIPO — Sintema Sport (K)
OJ C 166, 14.5.2018, p. 34–35
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
14.5.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 166/34 |
Action brought on 1 March 2018 — Kuota International v EUIPO — Sintema Sport (K)
(Case T-136/18)
(2018/C 166/44)
Language in which the application was lodged: French
Parties
Applicant: Kuota International Corp. Ltd (British Virgin Islands) (represented by: C. Herissay Ducamp, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sintema Sport Srl (Albiate, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative trade mark K — European Union trade mark No 11 380 771
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 December 2017 in Case R 3111/2014-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
hold and rule that the present action is admissible; |
|
— |
annul the contested decision in so far as it found that the applicant did not provide evidence of bad faith and held that the action seeking a declaration of invalidity based on Article 59(1)(b) of the EUTMR may not be allowed; |
|
— |
declare European Union trade mark No 11 380 771 invalid on the basis of Article 59(1)(b) of the EUTMR; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001. |