This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TN0082
Case T-82/18: Action brought on 13 February 2018 — Husky CZ v EUIPO — Husky of Tostock (HUSKY)
Case T-82/18: Action brought on 13 February 2018 — Husky CZ v EUIPO — Husky of Tostock (HUSKY)
Case T-82/18: Action brought on 13 February 2018 — Husky CZ v EUIPO — Husky of Tostock (HUSKY)
OJ C 134, 16.4.2018, p. 27–28
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
16.4.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 134/27 |
Action brought on 13 February 2018 — Husky CZ v EUIPO — Husky of Tostock (HUSKY)
(Case T-82/18)
(2018/C 134/39)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Husky CZ s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: L. Lorenc, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Husky of Tostock Ltd (Woodbridge, United Kingdom)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark HUSKY in the colours of blue, black and white — Application for registration No 4 442 431
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 January 2018 in Case R 812/2017-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
Plea in law
|
— |
The Board of Appeal did not properly take into consideration arguments and evidence submitted by the applicant and, therefore, it incorrectly considered what earlier rights the opposition was based on. |