Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 June 2019.#Pet King Brands, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark SUIMOX — Earlier EU word mark ZYMOX — Obligation to state reasons — Notification of a decision of the Board of Appeal — Good faith and diligence on the part of the addressee — Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-366/18.

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 June 2019.
Pet King Brands, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark SUIMOX — Earlier EU word mark ZYMOX — Obligation to state reasons — Notification of a decision of the Board of Appeal — Good faith and diligence on the part of the addressee — Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.
Case T-366/18.

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 June 2019.
Pet King Brands, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark SUIMOX — Earlier EU word mark ZYMOX — Obligation to state reasons — Notification of a decision of the Board of Appeal — Good faith and diligence on the part of the addressee — Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.
Case T-366/18.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2019:410