This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TA0748
Case T-748/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — Glimarpol v EUIPO — Metar (Pneumatic power tool) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a pneumatic power tool — Earlier design — Proof of disclosure — Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Different overall impression — Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002)
Case T-748/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — Glimarpol v EUIPO — Metar (Pneumatic power tool) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a pneumatic power tool — Earlier design — Proof of disclosure — Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Different overall impression — Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002)
Case T-748/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — Glimarpol v EUIPO — Metar (Pneumatic power tool) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a pneumatic power tool — Earlier design — Proof of disclosure — Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Different overall impression — Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002)
OJ C 339, 12.10.2020, p. 13–13
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
12.10.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 339/13 |
Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — Glimarpol v EUIPO — Metar (Pneumatic power tool)
(Case T-748/18) (1)
(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a pneumatic power tool - Earlier design - Proof of disclosure - Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Ground for invalidity - Individual character - Different overall impression - Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002)
(2020/C 339/15)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Glimarpol sp. z o.o. (Bytom, Poland) (represented by: M. Kondrat, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Metar sp. z o.o. (Gliwice, Poland) (represented by: R. Skubisz and M. Mazurek, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 October 2018 (Case R 1615/2017-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Metar and Glimarpol.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Glimarpol sp. z o.o. to pay the costs; |
|
3. |
Orders Metar sp. z o.o. to bear its own costs. |