This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TA0067
Case T-67/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Probelte v Commission (Plant protection products — Active substance 8-hydroxyquinoline — Request for amendment of the conditions of approval — Procedure for harmonised classification and labelling — Right to be heard — Legitimate expectations — Manifest error of assessment)
Case T-67/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Probelte v Commission (Plant protection products — Active substance 8-hydroxyquinoline — Request for amendment of the conditions of approval — Procedure for harmonised classification and labelling — Right to be heard — Legitimate expectations — Manifest error of assessment)
Case T-67/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Probelte v Commission (Plant protection products — Active substance 8-hydroxyquinoline — Request for amendment of the conditions of approval — Procedure for harmonised classification and labelling — Right to be heard — Legitimate expectations — Manifest error of assessment)
OJ C 61, 24.2.2020, p. 24–25
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
24.2.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 61/24 |
Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Probelte v Commission
(Case T-67/18) (1)
(Plant protection products - Active substance 8-hydroxyquinoline - Request for amendment of the conditions of approval - Procedure for harmonised classification and labelling - Right to be heard - Legitimate expectations - Manifest error of assessment)
(2020/C 61/29)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Probelte, SA (Murcia, Spain) (represented by: C. Mereu and S. Saez Moreno, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Lewis, G. Koleva and I. Naglis, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2065 of 13 November 2017 confirming the conditions of approval of the active substance 8-hydroxyquinoline, as set out in Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 and modifying Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/408 as regards the inclusion of the active substance 8-hydroxyquinoline in the list of candidates for substitution (OJ 2017 L 295, p. 40).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Probelte, SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |