Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TN0643

    Case T-643/17: Action brought on 21 September 2017 — Euroways v Commission and SRB

    OJ C 424, 11.12.2017, p. 41–41 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    11.12.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 424/41


    Action brought on 21 September 2017 — Euroways v Commission and SRB

    (Case T-643/17)

    (2017/C 424/60)

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: Euroways, SL (Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by: R. Vallina Hoset and C. Iglesias Megías, lawyers)

    Defendants: European Commission and Single Resolution Board

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the General Court should:

    Annul Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017 concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, S.A.;

    Annul Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme of Banco Popular Español, S.A.;

    Where appropriate, declare Articles 15, 18, 20, 21, 22 and/or 24 of Regulation No 806/2014 inapplicable, in accordance with Article 277 TFEU;

    Order SRB and the Commission to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.


    Top