This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0007
Case T-7/17: Action brought on 5 January 2017 — John Mills v EUIPO — Jerome Alexander Consulting (MINERAL MAGIC)
Case T-7/17: Action brought on 5 January 2017 — John Mills v EUIPO — Jerome Alexander Consulting (MINERAL MAGIC)
Case T-7/17: Action brought on 5 January 2017 — John Mills v EUIPO — Jerome Alexander Consulting (MINERAL MAGIC)
OJ C 63, 27.2.2017, p. 38–39
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.2.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 63/38 |
Action brought on 5 January 2017 — John Mills v EUIPO — Jerome Alexander Consulting (MINERAL MAGIC)
(Case T-7/17)
(2017/C 063/50)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: John Mills Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Jerome Alexander Consulting Corp. (Surfside, Florida, United States)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘MINERAL MAGIC’ — EU trade mark application No 12 151 379
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 October 2016 in Case R 2087/2015-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO and the other party to pay their own costs and those incurred by the applicant. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009. |