This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TB0101
Case T-101/17: Order of the General Court of 27 July 2018 — Apple Distribution International v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Aid planned by Germany to fund film production and distribution — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — No individual concern — Inadmissibility)
Case T-101/17: Order of the General Court of 27 July 2018 — Apple Distribution International v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Aid planned by Germany to fund film production and distribution — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — No individual concern — Inadmissibility)
Case T-101/17: Order of the General Court of 27 July 2018 — Apple Distribution International v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Aid planned by Germany to fund film production and distribution — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — No individual concern — Inadmissibility)
OJ C 381, 22.10.2018, p. 25–25
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
22.10.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 381/25 |
Order of the General Court of 27 July 2018 — Apple Distribution International v Commission
(Case T-101/17) (1)
((Action for annulment - State aid - Aid planned by Germany to fund film production and distribution - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - No individual concern - Inadmissibility))
(2018/C 381/29)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Apple Distribution International (Cork, Ireland) (represented by: S. Schwiddessen, H. Lutz, N. Niejahr and A. Patsa, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Samnadda, G. Braun and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2016/2042 of 1 September 2016 on the aid scheme SA.38418 — 2014/C (ex 2014/N) which Germany is planning to implement for the funding of film production and distribution (OJ 2016 L 314, p. 63).
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
There is no need to rule on the applications to intervene lodged by the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic and the Filmförderungsanstalt. |
|
3. |
Apple Distribution International shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, with the exception of the costs relating to the applications to intervene. |
|
4. |
Apple Distribution International, the Commission, the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic and the Filmförderungsanstalt shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene. |