Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TA0548

    Case T-548/17: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2018 — VF International v EUIPO — Virmani (ANOKHI) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative trade mark ANOKHI — Earlier EU figurative mark kipling — Earlier EU figurative mark representing the silhouette of a monkey — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 EU) — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001))

    OJ C 436, 3.12.2018, p. 46–47 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    3.12.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 436/46


    Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2018 — VF International v EUIPO — Virmani (ANOKHI)

    (Case T-548/17) (1)

    ((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative trade mark ANOKHI - Earlier EU figurative mark kipling - Earlier EU figurative mark representing the silhouette of a monkey - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 EU) - Damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)))

    (2018/C 436/65)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: VF International Sagl (Stabio, Switzerland) (represented by: T. van Innis, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Ken Virmani (Munich, Germany)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 May 2017 (Case R 2307/2015-4) relating to opposition proceedings between VF International and Mr Virmani.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 May 2017 (Case R 2307/2015-4);

    2.

    Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by VF International Sagl.


    (1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.


    Top