This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TN0882
Case T-882/16: Action brought on 15 December 2016 — Sipral World v EUIPO — La Dolfina (DOLFINA)
Case T-882/16: Action brought on 15 December 2016 — Sipral World v EUIPO — La Dolfina (DOLFINA)
Case T-882/16: Action brought on 15 December 2016 — Sipral World v EUIPO — La Dolfina (DOLFINA)
OJ C 46, 13.2.2017, p. 25–26
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
13.2.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 46/25 |
Action brought on 15 December 2016 — Sipral World v EUIPO — La Dolfina (DOLFINA)
(Case T-882/16)
(2017/C 046/28)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Sipral World, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: R. Almaraz Palmero, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: La Dolfina, SA (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘DOLFINA’ — EU trade mark application No 3 701 828
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 September 2016 in Case R 1897/2015-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO and the intervening party, LA DOLFINA S.A., to pay all the costs of the dispute before the General Court, including those relating to the procedure before the Second Board of Appeal. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Articles 15, 42, 51, 75, 78 of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Rules 22 and 40 of Regulation No 2868/95. |