Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TN0707

    Case T-707/16: Action brought on 3 October 2016 — Enoitalia v EUIPO — La Rural Viñedos y Bodegas (ANTONIO RUBINI)

    OJ C 419, 14.11.2016, p. 57–57 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    14.11.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 419/57


    Action brought on 3 October 2016 — Enoitalia v EUIPO — La Rural Viñedos y Bodegas (ANTONIO RUBINI)

    (Case T-707/16)

    (2016/C 419/74)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Enoitalia, Corte Vigna, Baldo, Belvino, Ca' del Lago, Invino, Vinuva, Cantine Borsari, Ca' Montini, E.I., Enoi, V.E.B., Cbe, Ca.Pi SpA (Enoitalia SpA) (Calmasino di Bardolino, Italy) (represented by: S. Rizzo, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: La Rural Viñedos y Bodegas SA Ltda (Capital Federal, Argentina)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Proprietor: Applicant

    Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘ANTONIO RUBINI’ — EU trade mark No 9 526 955

    Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 June 2016 in Case R 1085/2015-5

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul the contested decision;

    order EUIPO to pay the costs.

    Plea in law

    Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) read in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.


    Top