Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62016TN0620

    Case T-620/16: Action brought on 30 August 2016 — The Logistical Approach v EUIPO — Idea Groupe (Idealogistic)

    OJ C 402, 31.10.2016, p. 51–51 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    31.10.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 402/51

    Action brought on 30 August 2016 — The Logistical Approach v EUIPO — Idea Groupe (Idealogistic)

    (Case T-620/16)

    (2016/C 402/60)

    Language in which the application was lodged: French

    Parties

    Applicant: The Logistical Approach BV (Uden, the Netherlands) (represented by: R. Milchior, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Idea Groupe (Montoir de Bretagne, France)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

    Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word element ‘Idealogistic’– Application for registration No 12 318 234

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20/06/2016 in Case R 1435/2015-4

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    principally, annul the contested decision;

    —

    alternatively, amend the contested decision in that it wrongly confirmed the decision of the Opposition Division rejecting the registration of the mark 012318234 for the services ‘Consultancy in the field of logistics, including route selection, storage facilities and selection of means of transport’;

    —

    order EUIPO to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009;

    —

    Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
    Top