This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TJ0723
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 November 2017.#Mapei SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark RE-CONzerø — Earlier EU word mark ZERO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-723/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 November 2017.
Mapei SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark RE-CONzerø — Earlier EU word mark ZERO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001).
Case T-723/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 November 2017.
Mapei SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark RE-CONzerø — Earlier EU word mark ZERO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001).
Case T-723/16.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2017:807