EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TJ0362
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 June 2018.#Tillotts Pharma AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark XENASA — Earlier EU word mark PENTASA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-362/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 June 2018.
Tillotts Pharma AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark XENASA — Earlier EU word mark PENTASA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-362/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 June 2018.
Tillotts Pharma AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark XENASA — Earlier EU word mark PENTASA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-362/16.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2018:354