This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016CN0453
Case C-453/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 16 August 2016 — Openbaar Ministerie v Halil Ibrahim Özçelik
Case C-453/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 16 August 2016 — Openbaar Ministerie v Halil Ibrahim Özçelik
Case C-453/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 16 August 2016 — Openbaar Ministerie v Halil Ibrahim Özçelik
OJ C 383, 17.10.2016, p. 7–8
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
17.10.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 383/7 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 16 August 2016 — Openbaar Ministerie v Halil Ibrahim Özçelik
(Case C-453/16)
(2016/C 383/10)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Rechtbank Amsterdam
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Openbaar Ministerie
Defendant: Halil Ibrahim Özçelik
Questions referred
|
1. |
Is the expression ‘judicial decision’, within the meaning of Article 8(1)(c) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, (1) a term of EU law which must be given an autonomous and uniform interpretation? |
|
2. |
If so, what is the meaning of that term? |
|
3. |
Does the confirmation, as in the present case, by a member of the Public Prosecutor’s Office of a national arrest warrant previously issued by the police constitute such a ‘judicial decision’? |
(1) Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1).