This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016CB0589
Case C-589/16: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — Mario Alexander Filippi and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 53(2) and 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case C-589/16: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — Mario Alexander Filippi and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 53(2) and 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case C-589/16: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — Mario Alexander Filippi and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 53(2) and 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C 276, 6.8.2018, p. 9–9
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Case C-589/16: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — Mario Alexander Filippi and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 53(2) and 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — Mario Alexander Filippi and Others
(Case C-589/16) ( 1 )
‛(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 53(2) and 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)’
2018/C 276/12Language of the case: GermanReferring court
Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellants: Mario Alexander Filippi, Martin Manigatterer, Play For Me GmbH, ATG GmbH, Christian Vöcklinger, Gmalieva s.r.o., PBW GmbH, Felicitas GmbH, Celik KG, Christian Guzy, Martin Klein, Shopping Center Wels Einkaufszentrum GmbH, Game Zone Entertainment AG, Fortuna Advisory Kft., Finanzamt Linz, Klara Matyiko
Other parties to the proceedings: Landespolizeidirektion Oberösterreich, Bezirkshauptmann von Eferding, Bezirkshauptmann von Ried im Innkreis, Bezirkshauptmann von Linz-Land
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich (Regional Administrative Court, Upper Austria, Austria), by decision of 16 November 2016, is manifestly inadmissible.
( 1 ) OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.