Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016CB0345

    Case C-345/16: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 November 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège — Belgium) — Jean Jacob, Dominique Lennertz v Belgian State (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Legislative and factual background to the case in the main proceedings — Insufficient information — Manifestly inadmissible — Article 53(2) — Article 94 of the Court’s Rules of Procedure)

    OJ C 86, 20.3.2017, p. 3–3 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    20.3.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 86/3


    Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 November 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège — Belgium) — Jean Jacob, Dominique Lennertz v Belgian State

    (Case C-345/16) (1)

    ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Legislative and factual background to the case in the main proceedings - Insufficient information - Manifestly inadmissible - Article 53(2) - Article 94 of the Court’s Rules of Procedure))

    (2017/C 086/03)

    Language of the case: French

    Referring court

    Tribunal de première instance de Liège

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicants: Jean Jacob, Dominique Lennertz

    Defendant: Belgian State

    Operative part of the order

    The request for a preliminary ruling made by the tribunal de première instance de Liège (Belgique) (Court of First Instance, Liège, Belgium) by decision of 9 June 2016 is manifestly inadmissible.


    (1)  OJ C 326, 5.9.2016.


    Top