Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016CA0236

    Joined Cases C-236/16 and C-237/16: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 April 2018 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Asociación Nacional de Grandes Empresas de Distribución (ANGED) v Diputación General de Aragón (References for a preliminary ruling — Regional tax on large retail establishments — Freedom of establishment — Protection of the environment and town and country planning — State aid — Selective measure)

    OJ C 211, 18.6.2018, p. 4–4 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    201806010431917362018/C 211/042362016CJC21120180618EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL201804264411

    Joined Cases C-236/16 and C-237/16: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 April 2018 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Asociación Nacional de Grandes Empresas de Distribución (ANGED) v Diputación General de Aragón (References for a preliminary ruling — Regional tax on large retail establishments — Freedom of establishment — Protection of the environment and town and country planning — State aid — Selective measure)

    Top

    C2112018EN410120180426EN00044141

    Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 April 2018 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Asociación Nacional de Grandes Empresas de Distribución (ANGED) v Diputación General de Aragón

    (Joined Cases C-236/16 and C-237/16) ( 1 )

    ‛(References for a preliminary ruling — Regional tax on large retail establishments — Freedom of establishment — Protection of the environment and town and country planning — State aid — Selective measure)’

    2018/C 211/04Language of the cases: Spanish

    Referring court

    Tribunal Supremo

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: Asociación Nacional de Grandes Empresas de Distribución (ANGED)

    Respondent: Diputación General de Aragón

    Operative part of the judgment

    1.

    Articles 49 and 54 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding a tax levied on large retail establishments, such as that at issue in the main proceedings.

    2.

    A tax such as that at issue in the main proceedings imposed on large distribution establishments according, in essence, to their sales area, does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU to the extent that it exempts establishments whose sales area does not exceed 500 m2 and those whose sales area exceeds that threshold but whose basis of assessment does not exceed 2000 m2. Nor, in so far as that tax exempts establishments which pursue the business of selling machinery, vehicles, tools and industrial supplies, construction materials, plumbing materials and doors and windows, for sale only to professionals, fittings for individual, conventional and specialist establishments, and motor vehicles, as well as garden centres and service stations, does it constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU, provided that those establishments do not have as significant an adverse effect on the environment and on town and country planning as the others, which it is for the referring court to ascertain.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 260, 18.7.2016.

    Top