Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62014TN0603

    Case T-603/14: Action brought on 11 August 2014  — Drex Technologies v Council

    OJ C 361, 13.10.2014, p. 21–21 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    13.10.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 361/21

    Action brought on 11 August 2014 — Drex Technologies v Council

    (Case T-603/14)

    2014/C 361/31

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Drex Technologies SA (Tortola, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: E. Ruchat and C. Cornet d'Elzius, lawyers)

    Defendant: Council of the European Union

    Form of order sought

    —

    Declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded;

    —

    In consequence, order the European Union to compensate the applicant for the total loss suffered, up to EUR 10  000;

    —

    Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-592/14 Makhlouf v Council.

    Top