This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TA0210
Case T-210/14: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Mederer GmbH v OHIM — Cadbury Netherlands International Holdings (Gummi Bear-Rings) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Figurative mark Gummi Bear-Rings — Earlier national figurative mark GUMMY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-210/14: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Mederer GmbH v OHIM — Cadbury Netherlands International Holdings (Gummi Bear-Rings) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Figurative mark Gummi Bear-Rings — Earlier national figurative mark GUMMY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-210/14: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Mederer GmbH v OHIM — Cadbury Netherlands International Holdings (Gummi Bear-Rings) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Figurative mark Gummi Bear-Rings — Earlier national figurative mark GUMMY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
OJ C 118, 4.4.2016, pp. 23–24
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
4.4.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 118/23 |
Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Mederer GmbH v OHIM — Cadbury Netherlands International Holdings (Gummi Bear-Rings)
(Case T-210/14) (1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Community - Figurative mark Gummi Bear-Rings - Earlier national figurative mark GUMMY - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2016/C 118/24)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Mederer GmbH (Fürth, Germany) (represented by: C. Sachs and O. Ruhl, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar and H. Kunz, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Cadbury Netherlands International Holdings BV (Breda, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Padial Martinez, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 December (Case R 225/2013-5), concerning opposition proceedings between Cadbury Netherlands International Holdings B V and Mederer GmbH.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Mederer GmbH to pay the costs. |