This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014CA0398
Case C-398/14: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 January 2016 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 91/271/EEC — Urban waste water treatment — Article 4 — Secondary treatment or equivalent — Annex I, Sections B and D)
Case C-398/14: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 January 2016 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 91/271/EEC — Urban waste water treatment — Article 4 — Secondary treatment or equivalent — Annex I, Sections B and D)
Case C-398/14: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 January 2016 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 91/271/EEC — Urban waste water treatment — Article 4 — Secondary treatment or equivalent — Annex I, Sections B and D)
OJ C 106, 21.3.2016, p. 6–7
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
21.3.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 106/6 |
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 January 2016 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic
(Case C-398/14) (1)
((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 91/271/EEC - Urban waste water treatment - Article 4 - Secondary treatment or equivalent - Annex I, Sections B and D))
(2016/C 106/07)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Parties
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Guerra e Andrade and E. Manhaeve, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, J. Reis Silva and J. Brito e Silva, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Declares that, by not ensuring that discharges from urban waste water treatment plants were subject to an adequate level of treatment, meeting the relevant requirements of Annex I.B to Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1137/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008, in the agglomerations of Alvalade, Odemira, Pereira do Campo, Vila Verde (PTAGL 420), Mação, Pontével, Castro Daire, Arraiolos, Ferreira do Alentejo, Vidigueira, Alcácer do Sal, Amareleja, Monchique, Montemor-o-Novo, Grândola, Estremoz, Maceira, Portel, Viana do Alentejo, Cinfães, Ponte de Reguengo, Canas de Senhorim, Repeses, Vila Viçosa, Santa Comba Dão, Tolosa, Loriga, Cercal, Vale de Santarém, Castro Verde, Almodôvar, Amares/Ferreiras, Mogadouro, Melides, Vila Verde (PTAGL 421), Serpa, Vendas Novas, Vila de Prado, Nelas, Vila Nova de São Bento, Santiago do Cacém, Alter do Chão, Tábua and Mangualde, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4 of that directive; |
|
2. |
Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |