Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TB0116

Joined Cases T-116/13 P and T-117/13 P: Order of the General Court of 13 January 2014 — Lebedef v Commission (Appeal — Staff cases — Officials — Reports — Career development report — 2008 and 2009 evaluation period — Half -time secondment for the purposes of union representation — Staff evaluation reports covering the tasks carried out in the service to which he was assigned — Designation for union purpose — Actions dismissed at first instance as manifestly unfounded — Appeal dismissed in part as manifestly inadmissible and in part as manifestly unfounded)

OJ C 71, 8.3.2014, p. 21–21 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

8.3.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/21


Order of the General Court of 13 January 2014 — Lebedef v Commission

(Joined Cases T-116/13 P and T-117/13 P) (1)

(Appeal - Staff cases - Officials - Reports - Career development report - 2008 and 2009 evaluation period - Half -time secondment for the purposes of union representation - Staff evaluation reports covering the tasks carried out in the service to which he was assigned - Designation for union purpose - Actions dismissed at first instance as manifestly unfounded - Appeal dismissed in part as manifestly inadmissible and in part as manifestly unfounded)

(2014/C 71/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Giorgio Lebedef (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Two appeals brought against the orders of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2012, in Case F 70/11 Lebedef v Commission and in Case F 109/11 Lebedef v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking an order that those orders be set aside.

Operative part of the order

1.

The appeals are dismissed.

2.

Mr Giorgio Lebedef will bear his own costs and those incurred by the European Commission on the appeal.


(1)  OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.


Top