This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012FB0014
Case F-14/12 RENV: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 September 2015 — Schönberger v Court of Auditors (Civil Service — Officials — Referral back to the Tribunal after setting aside — Promotion — 2011 promotion year — Refusal of promotion — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Case F-14/12 RENV: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 September 2015 — Schönberger v Court of Auditors (Civil Service — Officials — Referral back to the Tribunal after setting aside — Promotion — 2011 promotion year — Refusal of promotion — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Case F-14/12 RENV: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 September 2015 — Schönberger v Court of Auditors (Civil Service — Officials — Referral back to the Tribunal after setting aside — Promotion — 2011 promotion year — Refusal of promotion — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
OJ C 371, 9.11.2015, p. 46–46
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
9.11.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 371/46 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 September 2015 — Schönberger v Court of Auditors
(Case F-14/12 RENV)
((Civil Service - Officials - Referral back to the Tribunal after setting aside - Promotion - 2011 promotion year - Refusal of promotion - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))
(2015/C 371/47)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Peter Schönberger (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: O. Mader, lawyer)
Defendant: European Court of Auditors (represented by: B. Schäfer and Í. Ní Riagáin Düro, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the defendant’s decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 in the 2011 promotion year.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. |
|
2. |
In Cases F-14/12 and F-14/12 RENV, Mr Schönberger shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Court of Auditors. |
|
3. |
In Case T-26/14 P, the European Court of Auditors shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Mr Schönberger. |