Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 September 2013. # Golden Balls Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark GOLDEN BALLS - Earlier Community word mark BALLON D’OR - Similarity of the signs - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Application for annulment filed by the intervener - Article 134(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal - Obligation to rule on the entirety of the action - Articles 8(5), 64(1) and 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009. # Case T-448/11.

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 September 2013.
Golden Balls Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark GOLDEN BALLS - Earlier Community word mark BALLON D’OR - Similarity of the signs - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Application for annulment filed by the intervener - Article 134(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal - Obligation to rule on the entirety of the action - Articles 8(5), 64(1) and 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-448/11.

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 September 2013.
Golden Balls Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark GOLDEN BALLS - Earlier Community word mark BALLON D’OR - Similarity of the signs - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Application for annulment filed by the intervener - Article 134(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal - Obligation to rule on the entirety of the action - Articles 8(5), 64(1) and 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-448/11.

European Court Reports 2013 -00000

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2013:456