Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 November 2012. # Paul Hartmann AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark Nutriskin Protection Complex - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 - OHIM's decision-making practice - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009. # Case T-415/11.

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 November 2012.
Paul Hartmann AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark Nutriskin Protection Complex - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 - OHIM's decision-making practice - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-415/11.

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 November 2012.
Paul Hartmann AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark Nutriskin Protection Complex - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 - OHIM's decision-making practice - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-415/11.

European Court Reports 2012 -00000

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2012:589