Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 April 2013.#Bell & Ross BV v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design or model representing a wristwatch case — Earlier design — Ground for invalidity — Lack of individual character — Overall impression not different — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Articles 4, 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Related to a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity — Community design court — Article 91 of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T‑80/10.

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 April 2013.
Bell & Ross BV v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).
Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design or model representing a wristwatch case — Earlier design — Ground for invalidity — Lack of individual character — Overall impression not different — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Articles 4, 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Related to a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity — Community design court — Article 91 of Regulation No 6/2002.
Case T‑80/10.

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 April 2013.
Bell & Ross BV v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).
Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design or model representing a wristwatch case — Earlier design — Ground for invalidity — Lack of individual character — Overall impression not different — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Articles 4, 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Related to a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity — Community design court — Article 91 of Regulation No 6/2002.
Case T‑80/10.

European Court Reports 2013 -00000

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2013:214