This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009CN0379
Case C-379/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Brussel (Belgium), lodged on 25 September 2009 — Maurits Casteels v British Airways plc
Case C-379/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Brussel (Belgium), lodged on 25 September 2009 — Maurits Casteels v British Airways plc
Case C-379/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Brussel (Belgium), lodged on 25 September 2009 — Maurits Casteels v British Airways plc
OJ C 312, 19.12.2009, p. 16–16
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
19.12.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 312/16 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Brussel (Belgium), lodged on 25 September 2009 — Maurits Casteels v British Airways plc
(Case C-379/09)
2009/C 312/25
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Arbeidshof te Brussel
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Maurits Casteels
Respondent: British Airways plc
Questions referred
1. |
Can Article 42 EC, in the absence of action on the part of the Council, be invoked by a private individual against his private-sector employer in a dispute before national courts? |
2. |
Do Article 39 EC, prior to the adoption of Directive 98/49, (1) and Article 42 EC, individually or in conjunction with each other, preclude the following situation: In the case where an employee who is in the service of the same legal entity/employer, otherwise than in the context of postings, is employed successively in a number of operating units of that employer in various Member States and in each case is subject to the supplementary pension plans applicable to those operating units,
|
(1) Council Directive 98/49/EC of 29 June 1998 on safeguarding the supplementary pension rights of employed and self-employed persons moving within the Community (OJ 1998 L 209, p. 46).