This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007FA0135
Case F-135/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 September 2008 — Smadja v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Recruitment — Appointment — Classification by step — New appointment of the applicant to the same post after his first appointment was annulled by judgment of the Court of First Instance — Principle of proportionality — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Duty to have regard to the welfare of officials)
Case F-135/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 September 2008 — Smadja v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Recruitment — Appointment — Classification by step — New appointment of the applicant to the same post after his first appointment was annulled by judgment of the Court of First Instance — Principle of proportionality — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Duty to have regard to the welfare of officials)
Case F-135/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 September 2008 — Smadja v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Recruitment — Appointment — Classification by step — New appointment of the applicant to the same post after his first appointment was annulled by judgment of the Court of First Instance — Principle of proportionality — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Duty to have regard to the welfare of officials)
OJ C 313, 6.12.2008, p. 58–59
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
6.12.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 313/58 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 September 2008 — Smadja v Commission
(Case F-135/07) (1)
(Staff case - Officials - Recruitment - Appointment - Classification by step - New appointment of the applicant to the same post after his first appointment was annulled by judgment of the Court of First Instance - Principle of proportionality - Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations - Duty to have regard to the welfare of officials)
(2008/C 313/106)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Daniele Smadja (New Delhi, India) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Martin and K. Herrmann, Agents)
Re:
First, annulment of the Commission decision appointing the applicant, an official placed initially in Grade A*15, step 4, inasmuch as it places her in grade A*15, step 1 following her re-appointment to the post of Director of Directorate B of RELEX after the annulment of her first appointment, and, second, a claim for non-material and material loss
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1. |
Annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 21 December 2006, placing Ms Smadja in grade A*15, step 1, with seniority in step as at 1 November 2005; |
2. |
Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay all the costs. |