Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62006TJ0146

    Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 13 February 2008.
    Sanofi-Aventis SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
    Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ATURION - Earlier national mark URION - Relative ground for refusal - Lack of likelihood of confusion - Lack of similarity between the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94.
    Case T-146/06.

    European Court Reports 2008 II-00017*

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2008:33





    Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 13 February 2008 – Sanofi‑Aventis v OHIM – GD Searle (ATURION)

    (Case T-146/06)

    Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark ATURION – Earlier national mark URION – Relative ground for refusal – Lack of likelihood of confusion – Lack of similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

    Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 71-73)

    Re:

    ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 February 2006 (Case R 227/2005‑1) concerning opposition proceedings between Sanofi-Aventis SA and GD Searle LLC.

    Information relating to the case

    Applicant for the Community trade mark:

    GD Searle LLC

    Community trade mark sought:

    Word mark ATURION for goods in Class 5 – Application No 1662311

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

    Sanofi-Aventis SA

    Mark or sign cited in opposition:

    National word mark URION for goods in Class 5

    Decision of the Opposition Division:

    Rejection of the opposition

    Decision of the Board of Appeal:

    Appeal dismissed


    Operative part

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Sanofi-Aventis SA to pay the costs.

    Top